Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-06 | 2018-04-03 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Titan gray | Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 639.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG K92 is a little bit better than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, with a overall score of 85.4 against 83.8. The LG K92 is a extremely newer phone than the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, but it is a little bit thicker and a bit heavier. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with a bit better performance than LG K92, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s also has more RAM memory.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s features a slightly better looking screen than LG K92, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2160 pixels resolution and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch in the display. The LG K92 has a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG K92 shoots greater videos and photos than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video resolution, the LG K92 also has a much more mega-pixels back facing camera and a way bigger back camera sensor. LG K92 counts with longer battery life than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone in this comparison, LG K92 is also by far the cheapest one, making it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.