Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-11-06 | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Titan gray | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a global score of 87.9, which is a bit better than LG K92's general score of 85.4. Despite being the best in this comparison, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is a just a bit thicker and just a little heavier cellphone than LG K92. Both phones we are comparing here work with the same Android 10 OS (Operating System), so both should give very similar OS features.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a bit sharper display than LG K92. They have a display with the same size, the same amount of pixels per inch of display and exactly the same 1080 x 2400 resolution. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a bit better CPU than LG K92. They have a Octa-Core processing unit and the same RAM memory amount.
The LG K92 counts with a much greater storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, and although they both have the same internal memory, the LG K92 also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has greater battery duration than LG K92, because it has an 18% greater battery size.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro shoots better photographs and videos than LG K92, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have a 64 megapixels resolution back camera, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also counts with a larger camera sensor taking higher quality photos and a much better video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.