Search


Compare phones

Samsung Chrono

SCH-R260, SCH-R261, SCH-R261A
Global Score
3536.1
Basic Information
LGSamsung
--0000-00-00
3.81 x 1.85 x 0.59 inches3.70 x 1.83 x 0.67 inches
3.17 ounces3.14 ounces
--Scratch-Resistant Glass
$ 90.00$ 80.00
Display / Screen
2 inches2 inches
176 x 220 pixels 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
TFTTFT
141 pixels per inch200 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
5.76.3
processor processor
GPUARM Mali-400 MP1 (320 MHz) GPU
5.765.94
Storage
71,68 MB internal memory--
microSD external memory slotNo SD card slot
0.50
Camera
2.00 MP0.30 MP
4.733.63
EDGE and GSMCDMA
SIM--
0.30.1
Battery Life
800mAh Li-Polymer Battery800mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
230 hours standby time
3 hours talk time
526 hours standby time
5 hours talk time
2.242.24
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.0, EDRBluetooth 2.1, EDR
--GPS

Comparison review

Samsung Chrono has a global score of 36.1, which is slightly better than the LG KE500's overall score of 35. Samsung Chrono is a thicker but just a little lighter cellphone than LG KE500. The Samsung Chrono counts with a better display than LG KE500, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Samsung Chrono also has a higher resolution of 320 x 240 and a higher display pixels density.

LG KE500 has a much bigger storage to store more games and applications than Samsung Chrono. Samsung Chrono counts with a little bit better processing power than LG KE500, and although they both have a 0-Core processor, the Samsung Chrono also has an extra graphics processor. Samsung Chrono counts with a battery duration that is very similar to the LG KE500 one.

The LG KE500 captures greater pictures and videos than Samsung Chrono, because it has a back-facing camera with lot more mega-pixels.

The Samsung Chrono not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheap compared to the other phone, making this phone an easy choice.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.