Search


Compare phones

Global Score
34.639.5
Basic Information
LGSamsung
--2012-10-15
3.74 x 1.77 x 0.38 inches3.84 x 1.99 x 0.72 inches
2.65 ounces3.70 ounces
$ 65.00$ 65.00
Display / Screen
--2.4 inches
176 x 220 pixels 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
TFTLCD
128 pixels per inch167 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
5.65.9
Performance
--Qualcomm QSC6155 chipset
processor Single-Core 480 MHz processor
--128 MB RAM
GPU GPU
5.766.57
Storage
131,07 MB internal memory--
No SD card slotNo SD card slot
0.60
Camera
1.30 MP1.30 MP
4.514.51
GPRS and GSM--
SIM--
0.20
Battery Life
600mAh Li-Ion Battery1000mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
200 hours standby time
2.5 hours talk time
240 hours standby time
4 hours talk time
1.922.56
Other Features
Bluetooth 1.2Bluetooth 3.0
--GPS

Comparison review

Samsung M400 has an overall score of 39.5, which is better than LG KG320's 34.6 global score. Samsung M400's body is extremely heavier and extremely thicker than the LG KG320. Samsung M400 counts with a faster processing unit than LG KG320, because it has 1 more cores. The Samsung M400 counts with a slightly better looking display than LG KG320, because it has more pixels per inch of display and a better resolution of 320 x 240px.

The LG KG320 features a superior storage to install games and applications than Samsung M400. The Samsung M400's camera is just as good as the camera in LG KG320, both of them have the same resolution back facing camera. The Samsung M400 counts with a way better battery life than LG KG320, because it has a 67 percent more battery capacity.

The Samsung M400 and the LG KG320 cost exactly the same, which makes it a simple decision.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.