Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 28.3 | 31 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Nokia |
| -- | 2007-05-03 |
| 3.54 x 1.85 x 0.78 inches | 4.13 x 1.77 x 0.33 inches |
| 2.72 ounces | 2.32 ounces |
| $ 130.00 | $ 85.00 |
| 128 x 160 pixels | 128 x 160 pixels |
| TFT | TFT |
| 137 pixels per inch | 73 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.7 | 4.8 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 2,05 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 0 | 0.1 |
| Camera | |
| -- | 0.30 MP |
| 0 | 3.63 |
| CDMA | EDGE and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 0.1 | 0.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 750mAh Li-Ion Battery | 700mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 170 hours standby time 3.5 hours talk time | 320 hours standby time 6 hours talk time |
| 2.16 | 2.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0 | Bluetooth |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Nokia 2630 is just a bit better than LG LX160, having a general score of 31 against 28.3. Nokia 2630 is a extremely thinner and somewhat lighter cellphone than the LG LX160. LG LX160 has a more vivid screen than Nokia 2630, and although they both have an equal 160 x 128px resolution, the LG LX160 also has way more pixels per inch of screen.
The Nokia 2630 features a CPU that is just as good as the LG LX160 one, both of them have a 0-Core CPU. Nokia 2630 counts with a much greater memory capacity to store more games and applications than LG LX160. The LG LX160 has a bit longer battery performance than Nokia 2630, because it has 750mAh of battery capacity against 700mAh.
Nokia 2630 features a greater camera than LG LX160.
Even being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Nokia 2630 is also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.