Compare phones
LG Octane
VN530| Global Score | |
| 34.7 | 37.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| 2010-10-27 | 2006-03-09 |
| 4.21 x 2.16 x 0.63 inches | 3.81 x 1.88 x 0.72 inches |
| 4.50 ounces | 3.77 ounces |
| $ 100.00 | $ 80.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 2 inches |
| 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA) | 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) |
| TFT | TFT |
| 133 pixels per inch | 200 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.7 | 6.3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 30,72 MB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 16 GB) external memory slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 1 | 0.4 |
| Camera | |
| 3.20 MP | 2.00 MP |
| 5.17 | 4.73 |
| CDMA | UMTS, EDGE and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 0.1 | 0.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| Li-Ion Battery | 950mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 340 hours standby time 6.3 hours talk time | 320 hours standby time 3.7 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 2.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 1.2 |
| GPS | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung SGH-Z400 has a score of 37.1, which is a bit better than the LG Octane's general score of 34.7. Despite of the fact the Samsung SGH-Z400 is much older and somewhat thicker than LG Octane, it's construction is still somewhat lighter. The Samsung SGH-Z400 has a brighter screen than LG Octane, and although they both have the same exact 320 x 240 resolution, the Samsung SGH-Z400 also has a much higher pixel number per inch of screen.
The LG Octane and the Samsung SGH-Z400 feature extremely similar processing units, both of them have the same number of cores. The LG Octane captures a bit better photographs and videos than Samsung SGH-Z400, because it has a much higher resolution back-facing camera. LG Octane features a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung SGH-Z400.
The Samsung SGH-Z400 counts with a much better battery duration than LG Octane.
Even being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the Samsung SGH-Z400 is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.