Compare phones
|
|
| Global Score | |
| 47.2 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 2.2 | -- |
| 2010-09-14 | 2018-10-18 |
| 4.43 x 2.28 x 0.51 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.66 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| -- | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 320 x 480 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 180 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 6.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 MSM7227 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM11 (Single-Core 600 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 418 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 200 (128 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.93 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 153,6 MB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 2.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 640 x 480 (VGA) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.5 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1250mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 150 hours standby time 5 hours talk time | -- |
| 2.96 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 has a general score of 80, which is way better than the LG Optimus Chic's 47.2 general score. Although Google Pixel 3 is somewhat heavier than LG Optimus Chic, it's a lot thinner and noticeably newer. The Google Pixel 3 counts with a much better performing processing unit than LG Optimus Chic, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processor, it also counts with 3,59 GB more RAM memory and more cpu cores.
The Google Pixel 3 has a much sharper screen than LG Optimus Chic, because it has a really bigger screen, a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2160px and a way higher pixel density. Google Pixel 3 shoots much clearer photographs and videos than LG Optimus Chic, because it has a camera in the back with lot more mega pixels and a much better 3840x2160 video definition.
Google Pixel 3 counts with a way bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than LG Optimus Chic, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 64 GB internal memory capacity. The Google Pixel 3 features a very superior battery duration than LG Optimus Chic, because it has a 133 percent larger battery size.
Google Pixel 3 is a bit more expensive than LG Optimus Chic, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.