Compare phones
|
|
| Global Score | |
| 47.2 | 51.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | ZTE |
| Android 2.2 | Android 7.1 Nougat |
| 2010-09-14 | 2017-09-19 |
| 4.43 x 2.28 x 0.51 inches | 5.73 x 2.83 x 0.36 inches |
| 4.66 ounces | 5.00 ounces |
| -- | Black |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 150.00 | $ 80.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.2 inches | 5 inches |
| 320 x 480 pixels | 854 x 480 pixels |
| TFT | -- |
| 180 pixels per inch | 196 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 6.8 | 6.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 MSM7227 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 8909 chipset |
| ARM11 (Single-Core 600 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A7, 32-bit, 28 nm (Quad-Core 1100 MHz) processor |
| 418 MB RAM | 1 GB RAM |
| Adreno 200 (128 MHz) GPU | Adreno 304 GPU |
| 6.93 | 8.01 |
| Storage | |
| 153,6 MB internal memory | 8 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 2.02 | 4.62 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP | 5.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| 640 x 480 (VGA) video resolution | 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution |
| 5.5 | 6.05 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.5 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1250mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 150 hours standby time 5 hours talk time | -- |
| 2.96 | 4.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The ZTE Tempo X is a bit better than LG Optimus Chic, with a global score of 51.7 against 47.2. The ZTE Tempo X body is much newer and notably thinner than the LG Optimus Chic's, but it is a little bit heavier. Both phones in this comparison work with Android OS (Operating System), but the ZTE Tempo X has 7.1 Nougat version and LG Optimus Chic has Android 2.2, providing you some nice extra features and better performance.
ZTE Tempo X features a better performance than LG Optimus Chic, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with a greater number of cores and a larger amount of RAM memory. The LG Optimus Chic has just a bit better screen than ZTE Tempo X, although it has a little bit lower pixel density, a really smaller screen and a lot worse 480 x 320 resolution.
The ZTE Tempo X has a much better camera than LG Optimus Chic, and although they both have a same resolution back facing camera, the ZTE Tempo X also has a much better video quality. ZTE Tempo X counts with a way bigger storage to store more apps and games than LG Optimus Chic, and although they both have a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 32 GB, the ZTE Tempo X also has 7,85 GB more internal memory.
The ZTE Tempo X has a much longer battery life than LG Optimus Chic, because it has a 2200mAh battery capacity.
ZTE Tempo X not only is the best devices in our comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to others, making it very easy to pick between these devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.