Compare phones
LG Optimus F3
SprintLS720
| Global Score | |
| 58.4 | 64 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | HTC |
| Android 4.1.2 | Android 4.0.3 |
| 2013-06-06 | 2012-04-04 |
| 4.57 x 2.44 x 0.40 inches | 5.31 x 2.71 x 0.35 inches |
| 4.00 ounces | 4.73 ounces |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 180.00 | $ 159.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 2 |
| 233 pixels per inch | 312 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8930 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB (533 MHz) RAM | 1 GB (500 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 305 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 8.19 | 8.37 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 5.72 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.30 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (29 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 5.94 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), EV-DO A, GSM and CDMA | LTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA |
| SIM | -- |
| 5.7 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2460mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 216 hours standby time 16 hours talk time | 7.5 hours talk time |
| 4.4 | 3.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
HTC Evo 4G LTE has a general score of 64, which is just a bit better than the LG Optimus F3's global score of 58.4. HTC Evo 4G LTE is an older and somewhat heavier cellphone than the LG Optimus F3, but HTC could make it somewhat thinner anyway. Both of these devices have Android OS (Operating System), but the HTC Evo 4G LTE has the older 4.0.3 version and LG Optimus F3 has Android 4.1.2.
HTC Evo 4G LTE counts with a bit better processing unit than LG Optimus F3, although it has a weaker graphics processor working at 400 megahertz, they both have 1 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores. The HTC Evo 4G LTE counts with a bit better display than LG Optimus F3, because it has a lot higher resolution of 1280 x 720 pixels, a better number of pixels per screen inch and a bigger screen.
The HTC Evo 4G LTE takes greater photographs and videos than LG Optimus F3, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the HTC Evo 4G LTE also has a lot higher 8 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera. The HTC Evo 4G LTE has a superior storage capacity for applications and games than LG Optimus F3, and although they both have an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 32 GB, the HTC Evo 4G LTE also has more internal memory capacity.
LG Optimus F3 features better battery lifetime than HTC Evo 4G LTE, because it has 2460mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone in this comparison, HTC Evo 4G LTE is also cheap compared to the LG Optimus F3, making it easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.