Compare phones
LG Optimus F3
T-Mobile and Metro PCSMS659
| Global Score | |
| 58.5 | 64 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | HTC |
| Android 4.1.2 | Android 4.0.3 |
| 2013-06-06 | 2012-04-04 |
| 4.57 x 2.46 x 0.40 inches | 5.31 x 2.71 x 0.35 inches |
| 4.00 ounces | 4.73 ounces |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 180.00 | $ 159.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 2 |
| 233 pixels per inch | 312 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8930 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB (533 MHz) RAM | 1 GB (500 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 305 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 8.19 | 8.37 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 5.72 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.30 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (29 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 5.94 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), EV-DO A, GSM and CDMA | LTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA |
| SIM | -- |
| 5.7 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2460mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 757 hours standby time 13.5 hours talk time | 7.5 hours talk time |
| 4.4 | 3.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The HTC Evo 4G LTE has a global score of 64, which is just a bit better than LG Optimus F3's general score of 58.5. Both phones we are comparing here use Android OS (operating system), but HTC Evo 4G LTE has 4.0.3 version while LG Optimus F3 has Android 4.1.2. The HTC Evo 4G LTE is an older and heavier phone than the LG Optimus F3, but HTC managed to build it thinner anyway.
The HTC Evo 4G LTE has a little faster CPU than LG Optimus F3, although it has a slower 400 megahertz graphics processor, they both have the same number of cores and a 1 GB RAM memory. The HTC Evo 4G LTE features a little sharper display than LG Optimus F3, because it has a lot higher 1280 x 720 resolution, a better pixels quantity in each inch in the display and a larger display.
HTC Evo 4G LTE has a much better storage capacity for games and applications than LG Optimus F3, and although they both have a SD extension slot that supports up to 32 GB, the HTC Evo 4G LTE also has 16 GB internal memory capacity. LG Optimus F3 counts with superior battery lifetime than HTC Evo 4G LTE, because it has a 2460mAh battery size.
The HTC Evo 4G LTE counts with a much better camera than LG Optimus F3, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same video resolution, the HTC Evo 4G LTE also has a camera with a way higher resolution.
The HTC Evo 4G LTE is not only the best phones in our comparison, but it's also cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.