Compare phones
LG Optimus F3
VM720| Global Score | |
| 58.4 | 64 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | HTC |
| Android 4.1.2 | Android 4.0.3 |
| 2013-06-06 | 2012-04-04 |
| 4.57 x 2.44 x 0.40 inches | 5.31 x 2.71 x 0.35 inches |
| 4.00 ounces | 4.73 ounces |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 180.00 | $ 159.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 2 |
| 233 pixels per inch | 312 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8930 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB (533 MHz) RAM | 1 GB (500 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 305 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 8.19 | 8.37 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 5.72 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.30 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (29 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 5.94 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), EV-DO A, GSM and CDMA | LTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA |
| SIM | -- |
| 5.7 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2460mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 216 hours standby time 16 hours talk time | 7.5 hours talk time |
| 4.4 | 3.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The HTC Evo 4G LTE has an overall score of 64, which is slightly better than LG Optimus F3's 58.4 overall score. Although the HTC Evo 4G LTE is older and heavier than LG Optimus F3, it's body is still thinner. These phones work with Android OS, but the HTC Evo 4G LTE has older 4.0.3 version while LG Optimus F3 has Android 4.1.2 version.
The HTC Evo 4G LTE counts with a bit better looking screen than LG Optimus F3, because it has a much higher 1280 x 720 pixels resolution, a bigger screen and a higher quantity of pixels per screen inch. The HTC Evo 4G LTE has a bit better processing unit than LG Optimus F3, although it has a weaker graphics processing unit running at 400 megahertz, they both have the same number of cores and 1 GB of RAM memory.
The HTC Evo 4G LTE captures way better photographs and videos than LG Optimus F3, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same (Full HD) video definition, the HTC Evo 4G LTE also has a camera in the back with way more megapixels. The HTC Evo 4G LTE features a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG Optimus F3, and although they both have a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 32 GB, the HTC Evo 4G LTE also has 16 GB internal storage capacity.
LG Optimus F3 counts with greater battery lifetime than HTC Evo 4G LTE, because it has 2460mAh of battery capacity.
The HTC Evo 4G LTE not only is the best devices of the ones in this comparison, but it's also cheap compared to the other phone, making this phone a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.