Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 58.4 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 4.1.2 | -- |
| 2013-06-06 | 2017-04-21 |
| 4.57 x 2.44 x 0.40 inches | 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.00 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| -- | Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 180.00 | $ 173.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 233 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8930 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB (533 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 305 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.19 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.94 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), EV-DO A, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2460mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 216 hours standby time 16 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.4 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S8 is much better than LG Optimus F3, having an 81.7 score against 58.4. Galaxy S8's body is a lot newer and a lot thinner, but much heavier than LG Optimus F3. The Samsung Galaxy S8 has a way better looking display than LG Optimus F3, because it has a much better 1440 x 2960 resolution, a way greater pixels density and a lot bigger display.
Galaxy S8 counts with a more powerful CPU than LG Optimus F3, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, it also counts with more RAM memory and a larger number of cores (and also faster). Samsung Galaxy S8 has a much better camera than LG Optimus F3, because it has a way better (4K) video definition and a back camera with a much higher resolution.
Galaxy S8 features a much better memory capacity for apps and games than LG Optimus F3, because it has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 256 GB and 64 GB internal storage. The Galaxy S8 counts with improved battery lifetime than LG Optimus F3, because it has a 3000mAh battery size against 2460mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy S8 not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheaper than the LG Optimus F3, making it an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.