Search


Compare phones

Global Score
57.763.4
Basic Information
LGMotorola
Android 4.1.2Android 5.0
2014-01-272015-02-25
4.82 x 2.55 x 0.55 inches5.11 x 2.63 x 0.48 inches
6.41 ounces5.11 ounces
--Black and White
--Scratch-Resistant Glass
$ 150.00$ 140.00
Display / Screen
4 inches4.5 inches
480 x 800 pixels 540 x 960 pixels
TFTIPS LCD
233 pixels per inch245 pixels per inch
Capacitive, Multi-touchCapacitive, Multi-touch
7.67.5
Performance
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 200 chipset
Krait (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor64-bit ARM Cortex-A53 (Quad-Core 1200 MHz) processor
1 GB RAM1 GB RAM
Adreno 305 (450 MHz) GPUAdreno 302 (400 MHz) GPU
8.19
Storage
4 GB internal memory8 GB internal memory
microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot
3.824.62
Camera
5.00 MP + 0.30 MP5.00 MP + 0.30 MP
--f/2.20 aperture
1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution
5.947.7
Networks
Wi-FiWi-Fi
Mobile Hotspot--
LTE (4G), GPRS and GSMLTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM
SIMMicro SIM
5.66
Battery Life
2460mAh Battery2390mAh Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
384 hours standby time
16 hours talk time
--
4.44.32
Other Features
Bluetooth 4.0Bluetooth 4.0
GPSGPS
NFC--
Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity SensorAccelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor

Comparison review

The Motorola Moto E (2015) has an overall score of 63.4, which is just a bit better than the LG Optimus F3Q's 57.7 general score. These devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Moto E (2015) has 5.0 version while LG Optimus F3Q has Android 4.1.2 version. Motorola Moto E (2015)'s body is newer, somewhat thinner and extremely lighter than LG Optimus F3Q.

Motorola Moto E (2015) features a better processor than LG Optimus F3Q, because although it has a slower graphics processing unit running at 400 megahertz, and they both have a 1 GB RAM, the Motorola Moto E (2015) also counts with a 64 bits processor and a higher number of cores. The LG Optimus F3Q features a little bit better looking display than Moto E (2015), although it has a little bit lower 800 x 480 resolution, a just a bit worse pixel density and a little smaller screen.

Moto E (2015) shoots way better photos and videos than LG Optimus F3Q. They have a back camera with a 5 mega pixels, the same video frame rates and the same (HD) video quality. Moto E (2015) has a lot bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than LG Optimus F3Q, and although they both have an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 32 GB, the Moto E (2015) also has 4 GB more internal memory capacity.

LG Optimus F3Q has a little better battery lifetime than Motorola Moto E (2015), because it has 2460mAh of battery capacity instead of 2390mAh.

Moto E (2015) is not only the best phones in this comparison, but it's also the cheapest, which makes this phone a very good choice.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.