Global Score | |
57.7 | 63.4 |
Basic Information | |
LG | Motorola |
Android 4.1.2 | Android 5.0 |
2014-01-27 | 2015-02-25 |
4.82 x 2.55 x 0.55 inches | 5.11 x 2.63 x 0.48 inches |
6.41 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
-- | Black and White |
-- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
$ 150.00 | $ 140.00 |
Display / Screen | |
4 inches | 4.5 inches |
480 x 800 pixels | 540 x 960 pixels |
TFT | IPS LCD |
233 pixels per inch | 245 pixels per inch |
Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
7.6 | 7.5 |
Performance | |
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 chipset |
Krait (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A53 (Quad-Core 1200 MHz) processor |
1 GB RAM | 1 GB RAM |
Adreno 305 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 302 (400 MHz) GPU |
8.1 | 9 |
Storage | |
4 GB internal memory | 8 GB internal memory |
microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
3.82 | 4.62 |
Camera | |
5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP |
-- | f/2.20 aperture |
1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution |
5.94 | 7.7 |
Networks | |
Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
Mobile Hotspot | -- |
LTE (4G), GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
SIM | Micro SIM |
5.6 | 6 |
Battery Life | |
2460mAh Battery | 2390mAh Battery |
Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
384 hours standby time 16 hours talk time | -- |
4.4 | 4.32 |
Other Features | |
Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
GPS | GPS |
NFC | -- |
Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
The Motorola Moto E (2015) has an overall score of 63.4, which is just a bit better than the LG Optimus F3Q's 57.7 general score. These devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Moto E (2015) has 5.0 version while LG Optimus F3Q has Android 4.1.2 version. Motorola Moto E (2015)'s body is newer, somewhat thinner and extremely lighter than LG Optimus F3Q.
Motorola Moto E (2015) features a better processor than LG Optimus F3Q, because although it has a slower graphics processing unit running at 400 megahertz, and they both have a 1 GB RAM, the Motorola Moto E (2015) also counts with a 64 bits processor and a higher number of cores. The LG Optimus F3Q features a little bit better looking display than Moto E (2015), although it has a little bit lower 800 x 480 resolution, a just a bit worse pixel density and a little smaller screen.
Moto E (2015) shoots way better photos and videos than LG Optimus F3Q. They have a back camera with a 5 mega pixels, the same video frame rates and the same (HD) video quality. Moto E (2015) has a lot bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than LG Optimus F3Q, and although they both have an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 32 GB, the Moto E (2015) also has 4 GB more internal memory capacity.
LG Optimus F3Q has a little better battery lifetime than Motorola Moto E (2015), because it has 2460mAh of battery capacity instead of 2390mAh.
Moto E (2015) is not only the best phones in this comparison, but it's also the cheapest, which makes this phone a very good choice.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.