Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 57.7 | 63.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Nokia |
| Android 4.1.2 | Android 10 |
| 2014-01-27 | 2020-05-29 |
| 4.82 x 2.55 x 0.55 inches | 5.93 x 2.82 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.41 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| -- | Tempered blue |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 150.00 | $ 110.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 1440 x 720 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 233 pixels per inch | 293 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 chipset | MediaTek Helio A22 MT6761 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Quad-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 305 (450 MHz) GPU | PowerVR GE8300 GPU |
| 8.1 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 5.94 | 7.48 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2460mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 384 hours standby time 16 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.4 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Nokia C2 Tava is just a bit better than LG Optimus F3Q, with a 63.3 score against 57.7. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but Nokia C2 Tava has the previous 10 version and LG Optimus F3Q has Android 4.1.2. Nokia C2 Tava's design is incredibly newer, extremely thinner and a little bit lighter than the LG Optimus F3Q.
The LG Optimus F3Q counts with a bit more vivid screen than Nokia C2 Tava, although it has a just a little worse pixels density, a much smaller display and a much lower 800 x 480px resolution. The Nokia C2 Tava counts with much more storage for games and applications than LG Optimus F3Q, because it has 32 GB internal memory and an external memory slot that allows up to 128 GB.
Nokia C2 Tava counts with a bit better hardware performance than LG Optimus F3Q, because although it has doesn't have a GPU, it also counts with a larger number of cores (and also faster) and more RAM. The Nokia C2 Tava features a very superior camera than LG Optimus F3Q, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Nokia C2 Tava also has a back camera with much more MP.
Nokia C2 Tava has greater battery duration than LG Optimus F3Q, because it has a 3000mAh battery capacity.
Nokia C2 Tava is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also by far the cheapest, making this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.