Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 49.7 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 4.1.2 | -- |
| 0000-00-00 | 2018-03-16 |
| 4.04 x 2.41 x 0.47 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 3.88 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.2 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 125 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 6.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 MSM7225A chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A5 (Single-Core 1000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 200 (enhanced) (200 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 7.47 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 3.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.06 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1540mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 730 hours standby time 16.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.36 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S9 has a score of 83.3, which is much better than LG Optimus L3 II's global score of 49.7. The Galaxy S9 body is thinner but incredibly heavier than LG Optimus L3 II. Galaxy S9 counts with a lot better hardware performance than LG Optimus L3 II, because although it has doesn't have an extra GPU, it also counts with a larger number of cores and a higher amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy S9 features a much more vibrant display than LG Optimus L3 II, because it has a lot greater pixels amount per inch of display, a way larger display and a much better resolution of 1440 x 2960. Galaxy S9 features a way better camera than LG Optimus L3 II, because it has a much more mega pixels camera.
The Galaxy S9 has a much better memory capacity to store more apps and games than LG Optimus L3 II, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 400 GB and 60 GB more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S9 has a way better battery lifetime than LG Optimus L3 II, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy S9 costs a little more money than LG Optimus L3 II, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.