Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 55.4 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 4.1.2, 4.0 | -- |
| 2012-10-08 | 2016-03-11 |
| 5.03 x 2.63 x 0.36 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.20 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 120.00 | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 245 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| TI OMAP4430 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Dual-Core 1000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR SGX540 (200 MHz) GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 7.74 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.94 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2150mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 672 hours standby time 5 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.08 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S7 has a score of 79.5, which is a lot better than the LG Optimus L9 T-Mobile's 55.4 overall score. Samsung Galaxy S7 is a much newer and thinner device than LG Optimus L9 T-Mobile, although it's also incredibly heavier. The Galaxy S7 has a more powerful CPU than LG Optimus L9 T-Mobile, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with more RAM memory and a higher number of cores.
The Galaxy S7 has an incredibly better display than LG Optimus L9 T-Mobile, because it has a bit larger screen, a lot greater quantity of pixels per inch in the display and a lot better resolution of 1440 x 2560px. The Galaxy S7 captures way better videos and photos than LG Optimus L9 T-Mobile, because it has a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a much higher 12 MP resolution back-facing camera.
Galaxy S7 counts with a way bigger memory for games and applications than LG Optimus L9 T-Mobile, because it has 32 GB internal storage capacity and a SD memory slot that admits up to 200 GB. Samsung Galaxy S7 counts with a much longer battery duration than LG Optimus L9 T-Mobile, because it has a 3000mAh battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S7 costs a little more money than LG Optimus L9 T-Mobile, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.