Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 61.5 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 4.0 | -- |
| -- | 2019-03-15 |
| -- | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 5.86 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 312 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.38 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 4.8 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2150mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.08 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 has a general score of 83.8, which is way better than the LG Optimus LTE II's 61.5 overall score. Galaxy A50 features a bit superior processor than LG Optimus LTE II, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with a greater number of cores (and also faster) and 2 GB more RAM.
The Galaxy A50 counts with a little bit better display than LG Optimus LTE II, because it has a really larger screen, a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a greater pixels quantity per inch of display. Samsung Galaxy A50 has a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than LG Optimus LTE II, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 512 GB.
Galaxy A50 counts with a superior battery lifetime than LG Optimus LTE II, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2150mAh. The Samsung Galaxy A50 takes much better videos and photos than LG Optimus LTE II, because it has a camera in the back with a way higher resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 costs a little more money than LG Optimus LTE II, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.