Search


Compare phones

Global Score
44.345.1
Basic Information
LGSamsung
Android 2.2Android 1.5
--2009-04-27
4.47 x 2.32 x 0.52 inches4.53 x 2.20 x 0.47 inches
4.55 ounces4.02 ounces
$ 80.00$ 75.00
Display / Screen
3.2 inches3.2 inches
320 x 480 pixels 320 x 480 pixels
LCDAMOLED
180 pixels per inch180 pixels per inch
Capacitive, Multi-touchCapacitive
6.86.5
Single-Core 600 MHz processor processor
GPU GPU
6.755.76
Storage
174,08 MB internal memory8 GB internal memory
microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC external memory slot
2.023.3
Camera
3.20 MP5.00 MP
640 x 480 (17 fps) (VGA) video resolution--
5.615.5
Networks
Wi-FiWi-Fi
HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSMHSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM
SIMSIM
3.33.5
Battery Life
1500mAh Li-Ion Battery1500mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
432 hours standby time
6.5 hours talk time
450 hours standby time
6.5 hours talk time
3.283.28
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.1, EDRBluetooth 2.1, EDR
GPSGPS
Accelerometer, Compass and Proximity SensorAccelerometer and Compass
FM Radio--

Comparison review

The Samsung Galaxy is a little bit better than the LG Optimus T, getting a overall score of 45.1 against 44.3. Samsung Galaxy is a lighter and a bit thinner cellphone than the LG Optimus T. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy has older 1.5 version and LG Optimus T has Android 2.2 version.

The LG Optimus T counts with a quite superior hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy, because it has 1 more processing cores. The LG Optimus T features just a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy. They have an equal 480 x 320px resolution, the same pixel density and a display with the same size.

Samsung Galaxy counts with much more storage capacity to install games and applications than LG Optimus T, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 7,83 GB more internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy's battery life is just as good as LG Optimus T's battery performance.

LG Optimus T takes clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy, although it has a camera in the back with a way lower 3.2 mega pixels resolution.

Even being the best phone in this comparison, Samsung Galaxy is also a bit cheaper, making it an easy choice.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.