Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 52.2 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2 | -- |
| -- | 2018-03-16 |
| 4.31 x 2.32 x 0.47 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 3.99 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| -- | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 320 x 480 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 165 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 302 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.01 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 3.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 800 x 480 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.06 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| EV-DO A and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 3.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1700mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 360 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.52 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S9 has a score of 83.3, which is much better than LG Optimus Zone 2's general score of 52.2. Samsung Galaxy S9's body is incredibly heavier but noticeably thinner than the LG Optimus Zone 2. The Samsung Galaxy S9 counts with a way better looking screen than LG Optimus Zone 2, because it has a lot greater number of pixels per display inch, a much larger screen and a way higher 1440 x 2960 resolution.
Galaxy S9 features a superior performance than LG Optimus Zone 2, because although it has doesn't have a GPU, it also counts with a higher amount of RAM memory and a larger number of cores. The Galaxy S9 has a lot bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG Optimus Zone 2, because it has 64 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 400 GB.
The Galaxy S9 has a much better camera than LG Optimus Zone 2, because it has a way better 3840x2160 video resolution and a back camera with a much higher 12 megapixels resolution. The Samsung Galaxy S9 has a superior battery lifetime than LG Optimus Zone 2, because it has a 3000mAh battery capacity instead of 1700mAh.
Samsung Galaxy S9 costs a bit more than the LG Optimus Zone 2, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.