Search


Compare phones

Global Score
35.538.9
Basic Information
LGNokia
--Symbian 9.3
2010-11-232008-02-11
4.31 x 2.21 x 0.51 inches4.25 x 1.85 x 0.59 inches
4.23 ounces3.17 ounces
$ 350.00$ 95.00
Display / Screen
2.8 inches2.2 inches
240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
TFTTFT
143 pixels per inch182 pixels per inch
YesNo touch screen
5.86.5
processorARM11 (Single-Core 369 MHz) processor
32 MB RAM128 MB RAM
GPU GPU
5.766.3
Storage
--122,88 MB internal memory
microSD, microSDHC (up to 4 GB) external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC external memory slot
0.560.6
Camera
2.00 MP5.00 MP
--640 x 480 (30 fps) (VGA) video resolution
4.736.05
EDGE and GSMHSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM
SIM, Dual SIMSIM
0.30.9
Battery Life
1500mAh Li-Ion Battery900mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
400 hours standby time
9 hours talk time
250 hours standby time
3.5 hours talk time
3.282.4
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.1Bluetooth 2.0, EDR
--GPS

Comparison review

Nokia 6220 classic has a global score of 38.9, which is a little bit better than LG P520's 35.5 global score. Nokia 6220 classic's design is way lighter than LG P520, but it is thicker and was released many years before. Nokia 6220 classic counts with a much better display than LG P520, because although it has a really smaller screen, and they both have the same exact 320 x 240 resolution, the Nokia 6220 classic also counts with a better pixels density.

Nokia 6220 classic counts with a little faster processing unit than LG P520, and although they both have a Single-Core processing unit, the Nokia 6220 classic also has more RAM memory. Nokia 6220 classic has slightly more storage capacity to install games and applications than LG P520, although it has no SD extension slot.

Nokia 6220 classic captures greater photographs and videos than LG P520, because it has a back facing camera with way more MP. LG P520 features a very superior battery life than Nokia 6220 classic, because it has 1500mAh of battery capacity against 900mAh.

The Nokia 6220 classic not only is the best devices in our comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.