Search


Compare phones

Global Score
31.234.1
Basic Information
LGNokia
--2008-04-28
3.82 x 1.97 x 0.67 inches3.45 x 1.73 x 0.62 inches
3.70 ounces3.88 ounces
$ 1200.00$ 339.00
Display / Screen
--2.1 inches
176 x 220 pixels 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
TFTOLED
--190 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
3.16.5
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
65,54 MB internal memory15,36 MB internal memory
microSD external memory slotmicroSD external memory slot
0.50.3
Camera
2.00 MP2.00 MP
--640 x 480 (15 fps) (VGA) video resolution
4.735.17
GPRS and GSMUMTS, EDGE and GSM
SIMSIM
0.20.4
Battery Life
800mAh Li-Polymer Battery860mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
200 hours standby time
2 hours talk time
300 hours standby time
4 hours talk time
2.242.32
Other Features
--Bluetooth 2.0, EDR

Comparison review

The Nokia 6600 fold is a bit better than LG P7200, having a 34.1 score against 31.2. Nokia 6600 fold's design is a little bit thinner but a bit heavier than the LG P7200. Nokia 6600 fold and LG P7200 count with very similar CPUs, they have the same number of cores. Nokia 6600 fold has a much sharper screen than LG P7200, because it has a higher 320 x 240px resolution.

The LG P7200 counts with much more storage capacity to install games and applications than Nokia 6600 fold, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 50,18 MB more internal storage capacity. Nokia 6600 fold features just a bit longer battery lifetime than LG P7200, because it has an 860mAh battery capacity.

The Nokia 6600 fold takes a little bit better pictures and videos than LG P7200. They have the same resolution back camera.

Nokia 6600 fold not only is the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.