Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 28.6 | 31.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| 2005-03-14 | 2005-11-08 |
| 3.53 x 1.76 x 0.93 inches | 3.90 x 2.10 x 0.60 inches |
| 3.35 ounces | 3.49 ounces |
| $ 200.00 | $ 90.00 |
| 128 x 160 pixels | 176 x 220 pixels |
| STN | TFT |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3 | 3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 30,72 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 0 | 0.4 |
| Camera | |
| 0.30 MP | 1.30 MP |
| 3.63 | 4.51 |
| CDMA | CDMA |
| 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 740mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 165 hours standby time 3.2 hours talk time | 215 hours standby time 3.3 hours talk time |
| 2.56 | 2.16 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 1.1 |
| -- | GPS |
Comparison review
The Motorola RAZR V3c has a general score of 31.2, which is just a bit better than the LG PM-225's general score of 28.6. The Motorola RAZR V3c design is just a little bit heavier but notably thinner than the LG PM-225, and both were only released 8 months apart. The Motorola RAZR V3c and LG PM-225 feature very similar displays, although the Motorola RAZR V3c also has a higher resolution of 220 x 176.
The Motorola RAZR V3c and LG PM-225 have quite similar processors, they have a 0-Core processing unit. The Motorola RAZR V3c captures much clearer videos and photos than LG PM-225, because it has a back camera with a much higher resolution. Motorola RAZR V3c features a lot bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than LG PM-225.
The LG PM-225 has improved battery duration than Motorola RAZR V3c, because it has a 35% more battery capacity.
The Motorola RAZR V3c not only is the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.