Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 28.6 | 31.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| 2005-03-14 | 2008-09-02 |
| 3.53 x 1.76 x 0.93 inches | 3.60 x 1.90 x 0.70 inches |
| 3.35 ounces | 2.70 ounces |
| $ 200.00 | $ 150.00 |
| 128 x 160 pixels | 128 x 160 pixels |
| STN | TFT |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3 | 3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| Camera | |
| 0.30 MP | 0.30 MP |
| 3.63 | 3.63 |
| CDMA | CDMA |
| 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 165 hours standby time 3.2 hours talk time | 4.4 hours talk time |
| 2.56 | 2.56 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 2.0 |
| -- | GPS |
Comparison review
The Samsung SPH-M320 is just a bit better than LG PM-225, having a 31.4 score against 28.6. Samsung SPH-M320 is a way newer cellphone, and it's also somewhat lighter and noticeably thinner than LG PM-225. Samsung SPH-M320 and LG PM-225 both count with really similar processors, both of them have the same number of cores.
Samsung SPH-M320 features a display that is very similar to the screen in LG PM-225, both of them have the same 160 x 128 resolution. LG PM-225 and Samsung SPH-M320 both have extremely similar memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos. The Samsung SPH-M320's camera is very similar to the LG PM-225 one, they have a camera in the back with a 0.3 MP resolution.
LG PM-225 and Samsung SPH-M320 count with very similar batteries duration.
The Samsung SPH-M320 not only is the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones, making it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.