Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 58.3 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 4.0, 2.3.7, 2.3 | -- |
| 2011-12-14 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.02 x 2.72 x 0.33 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.87 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| -- | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 199.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 217 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| TI OMAP4430 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Dual-Core 1000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR SGX540 (Dual-Core 304 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.01 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 4.62 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3.9 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1540mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 330 hours standby time 4.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.36 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 XL is much better than LG Prada 3.0, with a global score of 80.7 against 58.3. Google Pixel 3 XL's construction is newer and a little thinner than LG Prada 3.0's, but it is also extremely heavier. Google Pixel 3 XL has a better performance than LG Prada 3.0, because although it has doesn't have a GPU, it also counts with more RAM memory and a greater number of faster cores.
The Google Pixel 3 XL features a much better screen than LG Prada 3.0, because it has a lot better pixel density, a way higher resolution of 1440 x 2960 and a much larger screen. The Google Pixel 3 XL has a way better camera than LG Prada 3.0, because it has a way bigger aperture to take better photos and video in low light situations, a much more mega-pixels camera and a way higher 3840x2160 video quality.
The Google Pixel 3 XL has a lot bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than LG Prada 3.0, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 64 GB internal storage. Google Pixel 3 XL has a much better battery lifetime than LG Prada 3.0, because it has a 123 percent larger battery size.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we compare here, Google Pixel 3 XL is also the cheapest, making it easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.