Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 58.3 | 64 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | HTC |
| Android 4.0, 2.3.7, 2.3 | Android 4.0.3 |
| 2011-12-14 | 2012-04-04 |
| 5.02 x 2.72 x 0.33 inches | 5.31 x 2.71 x 0.35 inches |
| 4.87 ounces | 4.73 ounces |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 199.00 | $ 159.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| TFT | S-LCD 2 |
| 217 pixels per inch | 312 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| TI OMAP4430 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Dual-Core 1000 MHz) processor | Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 1 GB (500 MHz) RAM |
| PowerVR SGX540 (Dual-Core 304 MHz) GPU | Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 8.01 | 8.37 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 4.62 | 5.72 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.30 MP |
| f/2.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (29 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA |
| SIM | -- |
| 3.9 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1540mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 330 hours standby time 4.3 hours talk time | 7.5 hours talk time |
| 3.36 | 3.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The HTC Evo 4G LTE is a bit better than the LG Prada 3.0, getting a global score of 64 against 58.3. Both of these devices use Android operating system, but HTC Evo 4G LTE has the newer 4.0.3 version while LG Prada 3.0 has Android 4.0 version. Although HTC Evo 4G LTE and the LG Prada 3.0 were released only 4 months apart, the HTC Evo 4G LTE construction is a bit lighter but also a little bit thicker than the LG Prada 3.0.
HTC Evo 4G LTE counts with a more vivid display than LG Prada 3.0, because it has a better number of pixels per inch of display, a quite larger screen and a way better resolution of 1280 x 720. The HTC Evo 4G LTE has a little faster CPU than LG Prada 3.0, although it has a weaker GPU working at 400 megahertz, they both have 1 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores.
HTC Evo 4G LTE captures clearer photos and videos than LG Prada 3.0, because although it has worse 29 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same video definition and the same resolution back camera, the HTC Evo 4G LTE also counts with a much bigger aperture. The HTC Evo 4G LTE has a way bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than LG Prada 3.0, and although they both have an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 32 GB, the HTC Evo 4G LTE also has more internal storage capacity.
HTC Evo 4G LTE features better battery life than LG Prada 3.0, because it has a 30 percent larger battery size.
Despite of being the best phone in this comparison, the HTC Evo 4G LTE is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.