Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 58.3 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 4.0, 2.3.7, 2.3 | -- |
| 2011-12-14 | 2019-03-15 |
| 5.02 x 2.72 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 4.87 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 199.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 217 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| TI OMAP4430 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Dual-Core 1000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR SGX540 (Dual-Core 304 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.01 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 4.62 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3.9 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1540mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 330 hours standby time 4.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 has a global score of 83.8, which is a lot better than LG Prada 3.0's global score of 58.3. Galaxy A50's design is way newer and a bit thinner, but also somewhat heavier than the LG Prada 3.0. The Samsung Galaxy A50 has a quite superior hardware performance than LG Prada 3.0, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with a higher number of faster cores and more RAM.
The Galaxy A50 counts with a sharper screen than LG Prada 3.0, because it has a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, a much bigger screen and a lot better pixel number per display inch. Samsung Galaxy A50 features a lot bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG Prada 3.0, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
The Galaxy A50 shoots greater photographs and videos than LG Prada 3.0, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same (Full HD) video quality, the Galaxy A50 also has a way more megapixels back camera and a much larger camera aperture to take better low light photos and videos.
Galaxy A50 has a really longer battery performance than LG Prada 3.0, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 1540mAh.
Galaxy A50 is a little more expensive than the LG Prada 3.0, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.