Compare phones
LG Prada 3.0
P940Samsung Galaxy Ace 4
3GSM-G357FZ
| Global Score | |
| 58.3 | 60.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 4.0, 2.3.7, 2.3 | Android 4.4 |
| 2011-12-14 | 2014-06-30 |
| 5.02 x 2.72 x 0.33 inches | 4.78 x 2.48 x 0.43 inches |
| 4.87 ounces | 4.37 ounces |
| -- | Black and White |
| $ 199.00 | $ 130.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 4.3 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 480 x 800 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 217 pixels per inch | 217 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| TI OMAP4430 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 8916 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Dual-Core 1000 MHz) processor | Dual-Core 1000 MHz processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 512 MB RAM |
| PowerVR SGX540 (Dual-Core 304 MHz) GPU | Adreno 306 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 8.01 | 7.92 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 4 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 4.62 | 4.26 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 5.00 MP + 1.30 MP |
| f/2.80 aperture | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 6.82 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| SIM | Micro SIM |
| 3.9 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1540mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1500mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 330 hours standby time 4.3 hours talk time | 11 hours talk time |
| 3.36 | 3.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Ace 4 is slightly better than LG Prada 3.0, having a 60.7 score against 58.3. The Galaxy Ace 4 design is newer and somewhat lighter, but also a lot thicker than the LG Prada 3.0. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Ace 4 has a more recent 4.4 version and LG Prada 3.0 has Android 4.0 version, so it provides the user some nice extra features.
The LG Prada 3.0 counts with a little better processing power than Galaxy Ace 4, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG Prada 3.0 also has 512 MB more RAM and a much better graphics processing unit running at 608 MHz. The Galaxy Ace 4 counts with a little more vivid screen than LG Prada 3.0. Both of them have a screen of the same size, the same 800 x 480 resolution and the same pixel density.
LG Prada 3.0 has a slightly bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy Ace 4, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 32 GB against 64 GB, it also counts with 8 GB internal storage capacity. The LG Prada 3.0 features a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Ace 4, because it has a back-facing camera with a much higher 8 megapixels resolution and a way higher 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution.
The LG Prada 3.0 has just a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Ace 4, because it has a 1540mAh battery capacity.
Galaxy Ace 4 is not only the best devices of the ones we compare here, but it's also by far the cheapest, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.