Search


Compare phones

Global Score
38.740.4
Basic Information
LGSamsung
2008-10-132011-01-18
4.11 x 2.13 x 0.66 inches4.23 x 2.13 x 0.49 inches
4.59 ounces3.32 ounces
$ 90.00$ 79.00
Display / Screen
3 inches3 inches
240 x 400 pixels 240 x 400 pixels
TFTTFT
155 pixels per inch155 pixels per inch
CapacitiveCapacitive
5.95.9
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
61,44 MB internal memory--
microSD, microSDHC external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 16 GB) external memory slot
0.51
Camera
5.00 MP3.20 MP
720 x 480 video resolution320 x 240 (15 fps) (QVGA) video resolution
5.55.39
Networks
Wi-FiWi-Fi
HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSMEDGE and GSM
SIMSIM
3.32.7
Battery Life
950mAh Li-Polymer Battery1000mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
400 hours standby time
3 hours talk time
900 hours standby time
8.3 hours talk time
2.482.56
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.1, EDRBluetooth 3.0
AccelerometerAccelerometer
FM Radio--

Comparison review

The Samsung Star II is a little bit better than the LG PRADA II, getting a general score of 40.4 against 38.7. Samsung Star II's design is newer, much lighter and thinner than LG PRADA II. Samsung Star II counts with a display that's just as good as the LG PRADA II one, both have a same size screen, exactly the same 400 x 240 resolution and the same number of pixels in each inch of screen.

The Samsung Star II counts with a CPU that's just as good as LG PRADA II's CPU, they have a 0-Core CPU. Samsung Star II has a lot bigger storage to install applications and games than LG PRADA II. LG PRADA II has just a bit better camera than Samsung Star II, because it has a lot higher video definition and a much better resolution camera in the back.

Samsung Star II has just a bit better battery performance than LG PRADA II, because it has a 1000mAh battery size against 950mAh.

Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Samsung Star II is also cheap compared to the other phone.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.