Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Apple |
| 2017-08-02 | 2018-09-21 |
| 5.61 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.26 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 205.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 8940 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1400 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 8.64 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS has an overall score of 84.2, which is better than LG Q6's 71.8 overall score. IPhone XS is a newer and a bit thinner device than LG Q6, although it's somewhat heavier. IPhone XS counts with a bit better looking screen than LG Q6, because it has a slightly better 1125 x 2436 pixels resolution, a bit better display density and a bit bigger display.
The Apple iPhone XS has a greater performance than LG Q6, because although it has less processing cores , it also counts with a higher amount of RAM memory and a 64 bits processing unit. The LG Q6 features a way bigger storage to store more games and applications than Apple iPhone XS, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The iPhone XS shoots better photos and videos than LG Q6, because although it has a camera with lesser mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture and a lot better 3840x2160 video quality. LG Q6 features a bit better battery performance than Apple iPhone XS, because it has a 13 percent larger battery size.
Although iPhone XS is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the LG Q6, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG Q6. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy the LG Q6, giving up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.