Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| 2017-08-02 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.61 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.26 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 205.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 8940 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 is much better than the LG Q6, having an 80 score against 71.8. Google Pixel 3 is a newer phone, and it's also just a little bit thinner and a little bit lighter than the LG Q6. Google Pixel 3 counts with a little more vivid display than LG Q6. Both of them have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2160px, a same size screen and the same pixels density.
The Google Pixel 3 counts with a bit better processor than LG Q6, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Google Pixel 3 also has a greater amount of RAM. The Google Pixel 3 captures better photographs and videos than LG Q6, because although it has a worse resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low light photos.
The LG Q6 counts with a very superior storage to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The LG Q6 has just a little better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 3000mAh battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone in our comparison, Google Pixel 3 is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.