Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| 2017-08-02 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.61 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.26 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 205.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 8940 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 XL is better than LG Q6, with a general score of 80.7 against 71.8. The Google Pixel 3 XL construction is newer and just a little bit thinner than the LG Q6's, but it is heavier. Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a bit better screen than LG Q6, because it has a just a little greater pixel quantity in each inch in the display, a quite larger display and a better 1440 x 2960 resolution.
The Google Pixel 3 XL features a little better hardware performance than LG Q6, and although they both have 8 cores, the Google Pixel 3 XL also has more RAM. The LG Q6 counts with a way bigger storage for applications and games than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Google Pixel 3 XL has a superior camera than LG Q6, because although it has a less mega-pixels camera, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low-light photos and video and a way higher 3840x2160 video definition. Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a little better battery duration than LG Q6, because it has 3430mAh of battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Google Pixel 3 XL is also cheaper than the LG Q6.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.