Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 92.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-08-02 | 2024-03-22 |
| 5.61 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.26 ounces | 8.36 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Agate Grey and Frozen Berry |
| Aluminum | Glass and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 205.00 | $ 1389.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2800 x 1280 pixels |
| IPS LCD | LTPO |
| 439 pixels per inch | 453 pixels per inch |
| -- | 5000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 8940 chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1400 MHz) processor | 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 24 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 8.64 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 1 TB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 23.2 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.8 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 7.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is way better than LG Q6, with a 92.1 score against 71.8. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design body is newer than LG Q6's, although it's a little bit thicker and way heavier. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design features a superior processor than LG Q6, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design features a way better looking display than LG Q6, because it has a just a little greater screen density, a larger screen and a higher 1280 x 2800 resolution. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a very superior memory for apps and games than LG Q6, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 1 TB internal memory.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a lot better camera than LG Q6, because it has a way bigger aperture for better low-light photography, a much better 3840x2160 video definition and a camera in the back with way more megapixels. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a very superior battery life than LG Q6, because it has an 87% larger battery size.
Although Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG Q6, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG Q6. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design, else you can save a couple dollars and get the LG Q6, resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.