Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2017-08-02 | 2018-03-09 |
| 5.61 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.26 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 205.00 | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 8940 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ has a score of 82.5, which is better than the LG Q6's global score of 71.8. Although the LG V30S ThinQ and the LG Q6 were released only a couple of months apart, LG V30S ThinQ's body is a little thinner but also just a bit heavier. LG V30S ThinQ features a slightly better screen than LG Q6, because it has a bit bigger display, a just a bit higher screen density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2880.
LG V30S ThinQ features a very superior memory to install games and applications than LG Q6, and although they both have a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG V30S ThinQ also has 96 GB more internal storage capacity. LG V30S ThinQ counts with just a little better processing power than LG Q6, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM.
LG V30S ThinQ counts with a better camera than LG Q6, because it has a way better video resolution, a way larger diafragm aperture and a better 16 mega-pixels resolution back camera. LG V30S ThinQ features just a bit better battery duration than LG Q6, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity.
Although LG V30S ThinQ is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than LG Q6, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG Q6. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the LG V30S ThinQ, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the LG Q6, giving up some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.