Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| 2017-08-02 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.61 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.26 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 205.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 8940 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has a global score of 81.3, which is much better than LG Q6's 71.8 global score. Even though LG V35 ThinQ is a little heavier than the LG Q6, it's just a little bit thinner and also newer. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit better looking screen than LG Q6, because it has a quite larger display, a better resolution of 1440 x 2880px and a just a bit more pixels per display inch.
The LG V35 ThinQ features a better CPU than LG Q6, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM memory. LG V35 ThinQ takes much clearer videos and photos than LG Q6, because it has a lot better 3840x2160 video quality, a much larger aperture to take better low light photography and videos and a camera in the back with a higher 16 megapixels resolution.
LG V35 ThinQ has a quite bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG Q6, and although they both have an external memory card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB, the LG V35 ThinQ also has 32 GB more internal storage capacity. The LG V35 ThinQ has a little better battery duration than LG Q6, because it has a 3300mAh battery size.
LG V35 ThinQ costs more than LG Q6, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.