Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-08-02 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.61 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.26 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 205.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 8940 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ is much better than the LG Q6, with an 81.2 score against 71.8. The LG V40 ThinQ is a newer and just a little thinner phone than LG Q6, although it's also heavier. The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a quite superior hardware performance than LG Q6, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with a bit more vivid display than LG Q6, because it has a larger display, a just a bit greater amount of pixels per inch in the display and a better resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels. The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a better storage capacity to store more games and applications than LG Q6, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG V40 ThinQ also has 64 GB internal storage capacity.
The LG V40 ThinQ features a much better camera than LG Q6, because although it has a less mega pixels resolution camera, it also counts with a lot larger aperture and a much higher (4K) video definition. LG V40 ThinQ features a little longer battery life than LG Q6, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, LG V40 ThinQ is also a bit cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.