Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| 2017-08-02 | 2020-05-15 |
| 5.61 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.26 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 205.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 8940 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is a lot better than LG Q6, getting an 87.1 score against 71.8. The LG Velvet body is way newer and a bit thinner than the LG Q6's, but it's also somewhat heavier. The LG Velvet counts with a bit better processing power than LG Q6, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG Velvet also has more RAM memory.
LG Velvet has a display that's very similar to the LG Q6 one, because although the LG Velvet has a little bit worse quantity of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a bigger display and a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2460. The LG Velvet features a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than LG Q6, and although they both have a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG Velvet also has more internal storage capacity.
The LG Velvet counts with a very superior battery duration than LG Q6, because it has a 43% larger battery capacity. The LG Velvet counts with a way better camera than LG Q6, because it has a lot higher 3840x2160 video resolution, a bigger aperture for better captures in poorly lited environments and a back camera with lot more mega-pixels.
LG Velvet is more expensive than LG Q6, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.