Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 91.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-08-02 | 2020-10-15 |
| 5.61 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches |
| 5.26 ounces | 9.17 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora gray and Illusion Sky |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 205.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 8940 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.8 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Wing is a lot better than LG Q6, with a global score of 91.2 against 71.8. LG Wing's design is extremely newer, but way heavier and extremely thicker than the LG Q6. The LG Wing features a little bit better processing power than LG Q6, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG Wing also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
LG Wing features a screen that's just as good as the display in LG Q6, because although the LG Wing has a little inferior amount of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a bigger screen and a bit higher 1080 x 2460 resolution. The LG Wing counts with a greater camera than LG Q6, because it has a bigger aperture to capture better photography and videos in low light situations, a much higher 64 MP resolution back facing camera and a lot higher video resolution.
LG Wing counts with a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than LG Q6, and although they both have an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG Wing also has 224 GB more internal storage. LG Wing has longer battery lifetime than LG Q6, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Although LG Wing is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG Q6, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG Q6. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the LG Wing, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the LG Q6, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.