Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-08-02 | 2020-10-02 |
| 5.61 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.26 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 205.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 8940 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) is much better than the LG Q6, having a score of 87 against 71.8. Motorola razr (2020)'s construction is much newer and a bit thinner, but also a lot heavier than the LG Q6. LG Q6 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little better pixel amount in each inch in the screen and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels.
Motorola razr (2020) features a bit bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than LG Q6, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory capacity. Motorola razr (2020) counts with a little faster processor than LG Q6, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Motorola razr (2020) also has 5 GB more RAM memory.
Motorola razr (2020) shoots way better videos and photos than LG Q6, because it has a much larger diafragm aperture for better low light photography and videos, a back-facing camera with lot more mega-pixels and a lot better video quality. LG Q6 counts with just a bit longer battery life than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 3000mAh battery size.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG Q6, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG Q6. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy LG Q6, letting go a few specs and features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.