Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Nokia |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-08-02 | 2021-07-29 |
| 5.61 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| 5.26 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 205.00 | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 439 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 8940 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.8 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Nokia XR20 has an overall score of 80.8, which is much better than LG Q6's 71.8 general score. The Nokia XR20 body is a lot newer than LG Q6's, although it's much thicker and noticeably heavier. Nokia XR20 has a bit more vivid screen than LG Q6, because although it has a just a little lower screen density, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a bigger screen.
Nokia XR20 has just a bit better performance than LG Q6, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Nokia XR20 also has more RAM memory. The Nokia XR20 counts with a quite bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than LG Q6, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 512 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Nokia XR20 has a very superior battery performance than LG Q6, because it has a 54% more battery size. The Nokia XR20 counts with a very superior camera than LG Q6, and although they both have the same video definition, the Nokia XR20 also has a bigger aperture to take better photography and videos in low-light environments, a much higher resolution back facing camera and higher video frame rate.
Although Nokia XR20 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG Q6, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG Q6. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Nokia XR20, else you can save some dollars and buy the LG Q6, letting go a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.