Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-08-02 | 2020-09-02 |
| 5.61 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.26 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Sonic silver |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 205.00 | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 8940 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The nubia Red Magic 5S is a little bit better than LG Q6, with a 76.2 score against 71.8. Nubia Red Magic 5S's design is much newer, but incredibly heavier and somewhat thicker than the LG Q6. Nubia Red Magic 5S has a little more vivid screen than LG Q6, because although it has a little lower number of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a bigger screen.
The LG Q6 counts with much more storage capacity for apps and games than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Nubia Red Magic 5S features a quite better processing power than LG Q6, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has more RAM.
Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a greater camera than LG Q6, because it has a larger diafragm aperture to capture better photos and videos in low light situations, a way better 7680x4320 video quality and a camera in the back with a way better resolution. The nubia Red Magic 5S features a much better battery performance than LG Q6, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Although nubia Red Magic 5S is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG Q6, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG Q6. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get the LG Q6, giving up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.