Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-08-02 | 2020-04-27 |
| 5.61 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.26 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 205.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 8940 chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.8 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A31 has a global score of 81.3, which is better than the LG Q6's score of 71.8. The Galaxy A31 body is noticeably newer than the LG Q6's, although it's somewhat heavier and a bit thicker. Samsung Galaxy A31 counts with a display that is very similar to LG Q6's display, because although the Samsung Galaxy A31 has a just a little less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a bigger display and a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution.
LG Q6 counts with a slightly better memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A31, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A31 counts with just a bit better performance than LG Q6, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy A31 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A31 has a much better battery lifetime than LG Q6, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy A31 has a lot better camera than LG Q6, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A31 also has a bigger aperture to capture better photography in poorly lited situations and a back camera with way more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.