Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| 2017-08-02 | 2019-03-15 |
| 5.61 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.26 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 205.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 8940 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 has an overall score of 83.8, which is better than the LG Q6's overall score of 71.8. The Galaxy A50 design is newer and just a little thinner, but heavier than the LG Q6. LG Q6 and Galaxy A50 count with really similar screens, because although the Galaxy A50 has a little worse pixels density, it also counts with a bigger screen and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels.
The Galaxy A50 has a quite bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG Q6, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 512 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory. The Galaxy A50 counts with a little bit better processing power than LG Q6, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A50 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 features a superior camera than LG Q6, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a much bigger diafragm aperture and a lot higher 25 mega pixels resolution back camera. The Galaxy A50 features longer battery performance than LG Q6, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone in our comparison, Galaxy A50 is also cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.