Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-08-02 | 2019-10-20 |
| 5.61 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.26 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 205.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 8940 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50s is way better than the LG Q6, getting a overall score of 86.6 against 71.8. Galaxy A50s is a notably newer and just a little thinner phone than LG Q6, although it is somewhat heavier. Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with just a bit better hardware performance than LG Q6, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also has a higher amount of RAM.
Galaxy A50s and LG Q6 feature very similar displays, because although the Galaxy A50s has a bit inferior pixel number in each inch in the screen, it also counts with a larger display and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340. The Samsung Galaxy A50s features a lot better camera than LG Q6, because it has a much better 3840x2160 video resolution, a much better 48 mega-pixels resolution camera and a bigger aperture to capture better photography and videos in low-light environments.
Galaxy A50s counts with a better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG Q6, because although it has a SD extension slot that supports up to 512 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy A50s features greater battery performance than LG Q6, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.