Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-08-02 | 2020-04-29 |
| 5.61 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.26 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism cube black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 205.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 8940 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is way better than LG Q6, with a 90.8 score against 71.8. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is a much newer cellphone than the LG Q6, although it's noticeably heavier and just a bit thicker. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a screen that's just as good as the LG Q6 one, because although the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a quite lower pixels density, it also counts with a little bit higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a bigger screen.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a much bigger memory capacity for apps and games than LG Q6, because although it has a SD memory slot that supports 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory. The Galaxy A51 5G has a bit better performance than LG Q6, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy A51 5G also has 3 GB more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G features a much better battery life than LG Q6, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G captures way better pictures and videos than LG Q6, because it has a bigger camera aperture to take better photos and video in low light situations, a way higher resolution back-facing camera and a much better (4K) video definition.
The Galaxy A51 5G costs a lot more than the LG Q6, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.