Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-08-02 | 2019-04-26 |
| 5.61 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.26 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 205.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 8940 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A70 is just a bit better than the LG Q6, getting a general score of 76.9 against 71.8. The Galaxy A70 construction is newer and a bit thinner than LG Q6's, although it's somewhat heavier. The LG Q6 counts with a little bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2160 pixels resolution and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little higher pixel number in each display inch.
The Galaxy A70 counts with a little better performance than LG Q6, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A70 also has 3 GB more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with a better storage capacity to store more games and applications than LG Q6, because although it has a SD extension slot that supports 1,45 TB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy A70 counts with a much longer battery lifetime than LG Q6, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity. LG Q6 features a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy A70, although it has a lot tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for low light captures and video, they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates.
Galaxy A70 is way more expensive than the LG Q6, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.