Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-08-02 | 2020-01-31 |
| 5.61 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.26 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 205.00 | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 439 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 8940 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 is much better than LG Q6, getting an 87.5 score against 71.8. The Galaxy A71 design is a lot newer and just a little bit thinner than LG Q6's, but it's also heavier. The Samsung Galaxy A71 counts with a bit more powerful processor than LG Q6, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A71 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
LG Q6 has just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy A71, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2160 resolution and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch in the screen. Galaxy A71 shoots much better photographs and videos than LG Q6, because it has a much higher 64 mega-pixels resolution camera, a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low light images and videos and a lot higher (4K) video definition.
Galaxy A71 has more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG Q6, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 512 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. The Galaxy A71 counts with a much better battery lifetime than LG Q6, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 costs a lot more money than the LG Q6, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.