Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-08-02 | 2019-09-27 |
| 5.61 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.26 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 205.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 8940 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold is way better than the LG Q6, having a general score of 97.6 against 71.8. Galaxy Fold is a a lot newer and thinner cellphone than LG Q6, but it's also noticeably heavier. The LG Q6 counts with a slightly better display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2160px and a really smaller display, it also counts with a quite higher screen pixel density.
Galaxy Fold counts with a faster processing unit than LG Q6, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Fold also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy Fold features a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games than LG Q6, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage.
Galaxy Fold counts with a superior camera than LG Q6, because although it has a back camera with a worse resolution, it also counts with a much larger diafragm aperture to take better images and videos in low-light situations and a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality. Galaxy Fold features a really longer battery lifetime than LG Q6, because it has 4380mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy Fold is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG Q6, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG Q6. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get the LG Q6, letting go a few features and specifications, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.