Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-08-02 | 2020-09-11 |
| 5.61 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.26 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and White |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 205.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 439 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 8940 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.8 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M51 is way better than the LG Q6, with an 87.7 score against 71.8. Although the Samsung Galaxy M51 is way newer than the LG Q6, it's somewhat thicker and extremely heavier. The LG Q6 counts with a slightly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2160, it also counts with a bit more pixels per screen inch.
Galaxy M51 has a quite bigger storage to store more apps and games than LG Q6, because although it has an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. The Galaxy M51 features just a bit better performance than LG Q6, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy M51 also has more RAM.
Galaxy M51 features a much better battery performance than LG Q6, because it has a 133% greater battery capacity. The Galaxy M51 shoots much clearer videos and photos than LG Q6, because it has a back camera with lot more MP, a bigger aperture for better photography and videos in poorly lited situations and a lot higher 3840x2160 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.