Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| 2017-08-02 | 2020-08-21 |
| 5.61 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.26 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 205.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 439 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 8940 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is way better than LG Q6, with a score of 90.8 against 71.8. Samsung Galaxy Note 20's construction is extremely newer, but noticeably heavier and just a little thicker than LG Q6. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a display that's very similar to the screen in LG Q6, because although the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a bit less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a larger display.
LG Q6 has a way bigger memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy Note 20 features a greater hardware performance than LG Q6, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Note 20 also has 5 GB more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with a superior battery lifetime than LG Q6, because it has a 43% bigger battery capacity. The Galaxy Note 20 features a lot better camera than LG Q6, because although it has a back-facing camera with a lower resolution, it also counts with a way higher video resolution and a bigger camera aperture to capture better low light images.
Although Galaxy Note 20 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the LG Q6, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG Q6. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Galaxy Note 20, otherwise you can save some money and buy the LG Q6, resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.