Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 5.1 |
| 2017-08-02 | 2015-08-13 |
| 5.61 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.26 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Aluminum | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 205.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 8940 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 8.64 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 5 is much better than LG Q6, having a score of 79.3 against 71.8. Galaxy Note 5's construction is a little thinner than the LG Q6, but it's somewhat heavier and was released many years before. The LG Q6 counts with a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because although it has 1 GB less RAM, it also counts with a higher number of cores.
The Galaxy Note 5 counts with a more vivid screen than LG Q6, because it has a bit bigger screen, a little higher pixels amount in each display inch and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels. Samsung Galaxy Note 5 shoots much better videos and photos than LG Q6, because it has a more MP back facing camera, a larger aperture and a much better video definition.
LG Q6 counts with a much greater storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note 5, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy Note 5's battery lifetime is very similar to the battery duration in LG Q6.
Although Galaxy Note 5 is a better device, it is way more expensive than LG Q6, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG Q6. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy the LG Q6, letting go a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.